Complainant vs respondent.

SUPREME COURT Manila. SECOND DIVISION. A.C. No. 6567 April 16, 2008. JOSE C. SABERON, complainant, vs. ATTY. FERNANDO T. LARONG, respondent. D E C I S I O N. CARPIO MORALES, J.: In a Complaint 1 filed before the Office of the Bar Confidant, this Court, complainant Jose C. Saberon (complainant) charged Atty. Fernando T. Larong …Note: A Complainantt is the term used to describe the person who makes a complaint to the Human Rights and Diversity Officer (HRDO) about a breach of the Sexual Violence Prevention Policy. The Respondent is the term used to describe the person who is accused in, or is responding to, the complaint.Specifically, Adm. Matter OCA IPI No. 04-2113-RTJ was a result of the case before the sala of Judge Jose L. Madrid (RTC 51) entitled "Alita P. Gomez vs. Rodrigo Jarabo, et al.," for: Accion Publiciana and Damages, that was handled by respondent for the complainant Alita Gomez.This administrative case against respondent Atty. Rodolfo Macalino was initiated by a letter-complaint [1] ... The legal services of the respondent was sought by the complainant in behalf of her husband Antolin Cuizon who was convicted for Violation of Dangerous Drug Act of 1972. When the spouses had no sufficient means to pay the legal fees ...This administrative case arose from two identical Complaints [1] filed by complainant John Paul Kiener (John Paul) before the Office of the Bar Confidant [2] (OBC) and the Office of the Court Administrator [3] (OCA) praying for the imposition of disciplinary sanctions [4] against respondent Atty. Ricardo R. Amores (Atty. Amores).The OCA referred the Complaint filed …

Complainant claims that respondent is married to one Zenaida Ongkiko with whom he has five children, as appearing in his 1986 and 1991 sworn statements of assets and liabilities. Furthermore, he alleges that respondent caused his arrest on January 13, 1992, after he had a heated argument with De Castro inside the latter's office.

SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. A.C. No. 7136 August 1, 2007. JOSELANO GUEVARRA, complainant, vs. ATTY. JOSE EMMANUEL EALA, respondent. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: Joselano Guevarra (complainant) filed on March 4, 2002 a Complaint for Disbarment 1 before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Committee on Bar Discipline (CBD) against Atty. Jose …

JULY 9, 2018. A.C. No. 8962. JILDO A. GUBATON, Complainant vs. ATTY. AUGUSTUS SERAFIN D.AMADOR, Respondent. D E C I S I O N. PERLAS-BERNABE, J.: This administrative case arose from an affidavit-complaint 1 for disbarment filed by complainant Jildo A. Gubaton (complainant) against respondent Atty. Augustus Serafin D. Amador …A.C. No. 879 September 27, 1939. PEDRO DE GUZMAN, complainant, vs. TOMAS B. TADEO, Respondent. Office of the Solicitor-General Ozaeta, Assistant Attorney Amparo, and Pedro de Guzman for complainant. Pascual M. Beltran and Tomas B. Tadeo for respondent. This is an administrative case for malpractice filed with this court by the complainant Pedro ...I n Flores vs. Chua, the respondent lawyer was disbarred after he was found guilty of notarizing a forged deed of sale. The penalty of disbarment was imposed because in a previous administrative case, respondent was found guilty of violating Rule 1.01[16] of the Code of Professional Responsibility.deceive the Commission. In Complainant’s view, the location of where the conversation between Ms. Moulton and Ms. Brooks took place was irrelevant. 6 Respondent’s continued practice of using female pronouns to refer to Lynn throughout its briefs reflects the same bias upon which it based its exclusion of Lynn from freely shopping at the Center.

On September 15, 1997, complainant received from respondent’s secretary respondent’s August 26, 1997 letter addressed to a certain "SPO2 Bautista/warrant officer" requesting that the issuance of the warrant of arrest against complainant and her husband be held in abeyance pending the ongoing negotiations between them and his clients, the ...

A.C. No. 5817 May 27, 2004. EMMA V. DE JUAN, complainant, vs. ATTY. OSCAR R. BARIA III, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. QUISUMBING, J.: In her Salaysay filed with the Office of the Bar Confidant on August 29, 2002, complainant, former client of respondent, charged respondent with negligence in handling her labor case and threats against her ...

Before us is a complaint for disbarment [1] filed by Arty. Mylene S. Yumul-Espina (complainant) against Atty. Benedicto D. Tabaquero (respondent) before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP). Complainant charged respondent with violating Canon 1 [2] of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), specifically Rules 1.01, [3] 1.02 [4 ...Oct 11, 2011 · Before the Court is the verified affidavit-complaint [1] of Pacita Caalim-Verzonilla seeking the disbarment of respondent Atty. Victoriano G. Pascua for allegedly falsifying a public document and evading the payment of correct taxes through the use of falsified documents. The person who is named in the appeal and who responds to appellant's claims of fault in the underlying decision of the lower court is known as Respondent or Appellee. As we now have an idea of what the above terms mean we will further study them in detail.Joselano Guevarra filed a complaint for disbarment before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Committee on Bar Discipline (CBD) against Atty. Jose Emmanuel Eala a.k.a. Noli Eala (respondent) for. grossly immoral conduct and violation of the lawyers oath. The complainant first met respondent in January 2000 when his (complainants) then ... A.C. No. 7676 June 10, 2014 AMADO T. DIZON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. NORLITA DE TAZA, Respondent. Legal Ethics; Canon 16; Rule 16.01. FACTS: Amado Dizon alleged that he, along with his siblings, engaged the services of Romero De Taza Cruz and Associates to represent them in a case.Before the Court is a Complaint 1 disbarment dated November 11, 2014 filed by complainant Fe Eufemia Estalilla-Valmonte against respondent Atty. Jose C. Quesada, Jr. for violation of the Supreme Court's directive suspending him from the practice of law for a period of one (1) year pursuant to its December 2, 2013 Resolution in Dagala v. Atty. Quesada, Jr. 2

The present administrative case arose from a Disbarment Complaint initiated by Jonathan C. Parungao (Jonathan) against respondent Atty. Dexter B. Lacuanan (Lacuanan) …Offers of condolences should be responded to with a basic acknowledgement and a simple thank you verbally or in writing. An example of a condolences thank you note is: “It was very nice of you to think of me in this time of sadness.Score: 4.8/5 (65 votes) . The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court below, as either party can appeal the decision thereby making themselves the petitioner and their adversary the respondent. In lang=en terms the difference between complainant and respondent. is that complainant is the party that brings a civil lawsuit against another; the plaintiff while respondent is person who answers for the defendant in a case before a court. In some legal systems, when one appeals a criminal case, one names the original court as defendant, but ...PER CURIAM: For the Court's resolution are two (2) administrative cases for disbarment against respondent Atty. Ofelia M. D. Artuz (respondent), namely: (a) A.C. No. 7253 filed by complainant Atty. Plaridel C. Nava II (Atty. Nava II) for respondent's acts of allegedly willfully and viciously maligning, insulting, and scorning him and his father ...For the Court's resolution are two (2) administrative cases for disbarment against respondent Atty. Ofelia M. D. Artuz (respondent), namely: (a) A.C. No. 7253 filed by complainant Atty. Plaridel C. Nava II (Atty. Nava II) for respondent's acts of allegedly willfully and viciously maligning, insulting, and scorning him and his father, in a case; and (b) A.M No. MTJ-08-1717 where the Court ... Hence, in the absence of receipts or documentary evidence to substantiate the amount of ₱97,500.00 sought to be recovered by complainant from respondent, complainant is entitled to a refund in the amount of ₱50,000.00, which had been admittedly received by respondent from the Cabuellos as payment for attorney's/acceptance fees and other ...

A responding variable is the component of an experiment that responds to change. For example, if salt is added to water to see how the pH level changes, the water is the responding variable because it is the component of the experiment that...violation of Rule 140 of the Revised Rules of Court and the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices. Act (Republic Act No. 3019). The complaint alleged that Lucila Tan was the private complainant in Criminal Case. No. 59440 and Criminal Case No. 66120, both entitled People of the Philippines vs.

Complainant Samson Sindon charged respondent Raphiel Alzate, Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court (RTC)-Branch 1, Bangued, Abra and Atty. Janice Siganay Querrer, Clerk of Court of the same court with violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (RA 3019), [1] Section 5 of Republic Act No. 6713 (RA 6713) [2] and Section 1 of Rule 137 of the Rules of Court.Complainant claims that respondent is married to one Zenaida Ongkiko with whom he has five children, as appearing in his 1986 and 1991 sworn statements of assets and liabilities. Furthermore, he alleges that respondent caused his arrest on January 13, 1992, after he had a heated argument with De Castro inside the latter's office.In some areas of law, such as domestic relations, the person filing the complaint is the petitioner , and the person against whom the case is filed is the respondent. The complaint states the plaintiff's version of the facts, the legal theory under which the case is brought (negligence, for example), and asks for certain damages or other relief ...In his complaint, complainant argued that respondent violated his ethical duties when he misled and induced the COC to defy lawful orders - particularly, the COMELEC's TRO …A.C. No. 7676 June 10, 2014 AMADO T. DIZON, Complainant, vs. ATTY. NORLITA DE TAZA, Respondent. Legal Ethics; Canon 16; Rule 16.01. FACTS: Amado Dizon alleged that he, along with his siblings, engaged the services of Romero De Taza Cruz and Associates to represent them in a case.In this case, complainant submitted the following documents to prove her allegations: (1) the Service Agreement dated November 15, 2004 to prove the existence of attorney-client relationship between the parties; (2) the Petition for Annulment of Marriage [18] supposedly filed by respondent on December 8, 2004 with the RTC of Quezon City and ...

Score: 4.8/5 (65 votes) . The respondent is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.The respondent can be either the plaintiff or the defendant from the court below, as either party can appeal the decision thereby making themselves the petitioner and their adversary the respondent.

Item 7 - 519 ... ... plaintiff has investigated the charges against the defendant and found them to be of substance. In many jurisdictions, a complaint does not need ...

Before this Court is a Verified Complaint for Disbarment 1 docketed as CBD Case No. 14-4396 filed by complainant AA Total Learning Center for Young Achievers, Inc. (AA), represented by Loyda L. Reyes (Reyes) against respondent Atty. Patrick A. Caronan (Caronan) for violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility. A petitioner can be a plaintiff or defendant in lower court as either of the parties can present the case to a higher court for further proceedings. The person against whom a petition is filed by the petitioner in higher court is known as the Respondent. Respondent can be either the plaintiff or defendant from the lower court.A.M. No. 1608 August 14, 1981. MAGDALENA T. ARCIGA complainant, vs. SEGUNDINO D. MANIWANG respondent. AQUINO, J.: Magdalena T. Arciga in her complaint of February 24, 1976 asked for the disbarment of lawyer Segundino D. Maniwang (admitted to the Bar in 1975 ) on the ground of grossly immoral conduct because he refused to fulfill his promise …When you have a problem with a product or service, you don’t have to ignore the issue and move on. There are several ways you can complain, and, in some cases, you can even take legal action.A petitioner can be a plaintiff or defendant in lower court as either of the parties can present the case to a higher court for further proceedings. The person against whom a petition is filed by the petitioner in higher court is known as the Respondent. Respondent can be either the plaintiff or defendant from the lower court. Complainant claims that respondent yielded 'one (1) Super .38 cal. Springfield Automatic Pistol, SN NMII 3138, one (1) magazine with seven (7) live ammos and three (3) spent (empty) shells.' Complainant adds that respondent presented only an unsigned Memorandum Receipt (MR) of the firearm without any Mission Order or Permit to Carry. Before the Court is a complaint for disbarment [1] filed on June 30, 2014 by Dr. Basilio Malvar (complainant) against Atty. Cora Jane P. Baleros (respondent) for acts amounting to grave misconduct consisting of falsification of public document, violation of Administrative Matter No. 02-8-13-SC or the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice (Notarial Rules) and the …SUPREME COURT Manila. EN BANC. Adm. Case No. 1424 October 15, 1991. ISMAELA DIMAGIBA, complainant, vs. ATTY. JOSE MONTALVO, JR., respondent. PER CURIAM: This is a complaint filed by Ismaela Dimagiba against Atty. Jose Montalvo for Malpractice, for stretching to almost a half a century a litigation arising from the probate of a will of the late …A.C. No. 6116 August 1, 2012. ENGR. GILBERT TUMBOKON, Complainant, ATTY. MARIANO R. PEFIANCO, Respondent. Before the Court is an administrative complaint for disbarment filed by complainant Engr. Gilbert Tumbokon against respondent Atty. Mariano R. Pefianco for grave dishonesty, gross misconduct constituting deceit and grossly immoral conduct.Footnotes. 1 Rollo (A.M. No. MTJ-12-1813), pp. 888-889. 2 Section 5. Officers and employees of all departments and agencies except those covered by special laws shall render not less than eight hours of work a day for five days a week or a total of fo1ty hours a week, exclusive of time for lunch.Complainant made several demands, the last being a formal letter [4] sent on September 25, 2002; [5] however, respondent still failed and refused to pay his debt without justifiable reason. Consequently, complainant instituted a case for seven counts of violation of B.P. Blg. 22 against the respondent before the Municipal Trial Court of Sta. Maria, Bulacan. [6]

TOMAS P. TAN, JR., complainant, vs. ATTY. HAIDE V. GUMBA, respondent. A. No. 9000, SPECIAL FIRST DIVISION, January 10, 2018, DEL CASTILLO, J. It is common sense that when the Court orders the suspension of a lawyer from the practice of law, the lawyer must desist from performing all functions which require the application of legal knowledge within the period of his or her suspension. Note: A Complainantt is the term used to describe the person who makes a complaint to the Human Rights and Diversity Officer (HRDO) about a breach of the Sexual Violence …The Court dismisses the administrative complaint against respondent for lack of jurisdiction. In the case of Alicias vs. Atty. Macatangay, et al., 12 the Court pronounced that jurisdiction over administrative cases against government lawyers relating to acts committed in the performance of their official functions, lies with the Ombudsman which exercises administrative supervision over them; thus:[ A.C. No. 7446, December 09, 2020 ] MICHELLE A. BUENAVENTURA, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. DANY B. GILLE, RESPONDENT. D E C I S I O N. PER CURIAM: This is a Petition for Suspension and Disbarment1 filed by complainant Michelle A. Buenaventura (Michelle) against Atty. Dany B. Gille (Atty. Gille) for Gross Misconduct.Instagram:https://instagram. kn graphjoel embiid kuspecial education history timelineadrianna papell wedding band A.M. No. RTJ-89-286 July 11, 1991. ROAN I. LIBARIOS, complainant, vs. JUDGE ROSARITO F. DABALOS, respondent. Roan L. Libarios for and on his own behalf. R E S O L U T I O N. PADILLA, J.: This is an administrative complaint filed by Roan I. Libarios for and on behalf of his client Mariano Corvera, Jr. against respondent Judge Rosarito F. Dabalos ... masters in reading onlineengineering student That respondent received Php100,000.00 of the mortgage loan secured by the mortgagee on the aforementioned property of complainant; That respondent did not inform the complainant about the unauthorized mortgage and sale of his property; That respondent has a loan obligation to Mr. Roberto Ho;Adm. Case No. 5094 August 6, 2002. NOEMI ARANDIA, complainant, vs. ATTY. ERMANDO MAGALONG, respondent. R E S O L U T I O N. KAPUNAN, J.: On July 16, 1999, complainant Noemi Arandia filed with this Court a complaint-affidavit charging respondent Atty. Ermando Magalong of violating the Code of Professional Responsibility for making threats against her and her husband in connection with ... amc food order [ A. No. 12079, November 10, 2020 ] EDUARDO B. MANALANG, COMPLAINANT, VS. ATTY. CRISTINA BENOSA BUENDIA, RESPONDENT. FACTS: Before us is a disbarment complaint against Atty. Cristina Benosa Buendia (Atty. Buendia) for allegedly deceiving complainant Eduardo B. Manalang (Manalang) in connection with the latter's petition for nullity of his marriage.This administrative case stemmed from a verified letter-complaint 1 dated December 17, 2010 filed by Hernanie P. Dandoy (Dandoy) before the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) against respondent Atty. Roland G. Edayan (respondent) for violation of Canons 1, 3, and 7 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). 2. The Facts. In the complaint, Dandoy alleged that on …